Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers are the key responsible people who take the article in different forms for the publishing of the article. The manuscript will be assigned to an editor, who in turn selects one or more editorial board members or reviewers to review it. Reviewers check the quality and accuracy of the work done by the authors.

Reviews of manuscripts should follow these guidelines

• After receiving the invitation reviewer ought to verify whether the topic is within the area of expertise or not. He/she should intimate their availability to complete the review in given time
• One can intimate us your opinion of accepting (or) declining the invitation. If you're unable to accept the invitation you can suggest any of your colleagues then editor may invite that person to review and you should not transfer your invitation
• If a reviewer accepts to review the manuscript then the reviewer should send the acceptance letter to the Editor.
• Reviewers should send the review comments within the provided time frame.
• If the assigned manuscript doesn't meet the quality of work to be published then the same has to be informed to the Editor.
• During the review process if it is found that the research paper is not suitable, then one can intimate it to the Editor
• Reviewers aren't entertained to discuss regarding the paper with respective author(s)
• Avoid personal & financial conflicts.
• The final decision relating to modification, acceptance, or rejection of a manuscript rests entirely with the editor.
• Reviewer cannot save the copy of review and have submit it to the editor who is the decision maker

Advantages

• A certificate is awarded as a credit of your valuable contribution and support.
• Additional discounts for attendees to our collaborated conferences/webinars.